slick! i like how the links light up...

Page isn't loading, it's blocked at work

I have to agree with keepwalking07. The only thing I didn't like that I saw on there was the banner. The banner's good, but I feel like it could be...something; I'm not sure.

I think the change might be a little abrupt between the banner and the page, but I can't decide whether that's just endemic to that specific banner, or whether it would apply to all of them on that layout. I lean more towards the former, though.

Took a damn long time to load, but the user interface is very clean, VERY modern, simplistic and tasteful. I like it a lot.

I have not had the chance to browse much because of loading times, but from what I remember when I visited it a long time ago, it was pretty good.

i'm agreeing that the page size is set small. i think it would cleaner if it it was resized out to be larger. also, some of the images come out really small when you click on them. makes it hard to see all the lovely details. and personally, i'm not a huge fan of pop-ups--prefer to see images open on a separate page--although i think you did a nice job with that anyway.

it's a great site, well done man

It is a very well designed website. A big part of what I think about it has to do with how many webpages you have already worked on; which if my memory is correct, isn't very many.

The site has lots of areas that feel very professional such as the loading and opening animation for images and other areas that are less so, such as the buttons.

As for the source code I can actually see, that all looks very well done. That did make me curious though, did you use a wysiwyg editor for this or did you do most of it by hand? One of the reasons I ask is because it almost looks hand-coded, particularly since you commented out one part.

I like it though, not bad if you have done a couple of web pages, great if it's one of your first ones. Oh yeah, you get bonus points for not overdoing it on the flash. Flash is such an ugly and stupid thing to design webpages in, but somehow it's always the flash-only webpages that get the Diamond Award each year. *sigh* It has it's places but a lot of people way over do it.

nice layout, smallish gallery, though I'm taking you're in the process of transferring more files to the server.
Question since i'm thinking of making a online gallery on the site I own...
What did you use for the gallery part?

I'm no big fan of rounded things with boarder, feels a bit 90's. Other than that it's a rather clean and easy structure.

Also you got a lot of double-sections as of artworks/wallpapers, perhaps should be in the same place. The ammount of works published is insanley high, mabye reduce it and only keeo your very best pieces, easier to get a good view of your skills and knowledge rather than have 500 pieces to scroll through. You get the picture here. Less is more you know

later dude, rob

Nothing to mention really, besides the fact that the row of pictures seems to get cut of slightly in Safari. Otherwise a nice site.